If you have not already done so, be sure to read the explanation of the purpose of proficiency evaluations. The following is the first draft of Proficiency Evaluation 330-3, the best Assessment 3 that I can write, i.e. it has the best and most important questions I can think of on LMs VI - X. (Like the gradable Assessment 3, this evaluation is derived directly from PreAssessment 3 following the "rules" specified at the beginning of the PreAssessment.) I place this in the "public domain", so that everyone can not only evaluate their current learning but can also detect misunderstandings of important concepts and subsequently correct them. If you are not taking the course for credit, this evaluation can serve as a "test" of your learning that you can grade and correct yourself. If you are taking the course for credit, this evaluation along with PreAssessment 3, should prepare you for Assessment 3, which will contribute to your grade for the course.
To consider yourself proficient in knowledge and understanding
of concepts of LMs VI - X, you should be able to answer all of the
following questions. Since this evaluation is to provide you, individually,
with information on your proficiency in the subject, you should NOT prejudice
your feedback. Therefore,
DO
NOT GUESS on questions whose answers you do not know;
leave them unchecked; this will give you feedback on the questions you
do think you know. After you have completed the Evaluation, click
on the link, "Correct Evalluation", at the end of the questions.You will
get an immediate response informing you of the percentage of your answers
that were correct. You will also see the answers that were incorrect;
questions that you left blank will be marked "undefined". If you
do not make 100% on this Evaluation, you should note your mistakes, study
the Learning Modules and discover the origin of those mistakes, and retake
the Evaluation -- do this until you receive 100%. Remember,
it is also important to realize that knowing (and understanding) the
answers to these few question may be enough suggest "proficiency",
but it is not enough for "mastery"; for mastery you should (1) understand
the other possible question answers (that are not the correct answer to
the particular question) as well as (2) recognize those answers which are
"nonsense
answers", i.e. that have nothing to do with the course subject matter.