PART A: Example of Modularization without parameters
The following SAC, illustrates the simplest, and most fundamental type of modularized algorithm, the input-process-output sequence. (a) Do a trace of the following algorithm. (Assume that the value of the variable x is 100. Use any value of A and B that you desire.) (b) What does this algorithm do?
1"Trace" means to create a table of variable values for A, B, S, D, Q, and P and then pencil through the instructions of the SAC, placing the value of each variable, as it is assigned, under the column for that variable.
SAQ 1: What would the SAC of the unmodularized version of this algorithm look like?
PART B: Algorithm of PART A with parameters
The following SAC is a modification of the algorithm in Part A that incorporates the passing of data via parameters (OP1, OP2, OP3; IP1, IP2, IP3 and OP1, OP2, OP3, and OP4.)

SAQ
2: (a) What is the fundamental difference between the algorithms in PART
A and PARTB? (b) What fundamental danger does the alogorithm in PART
B overcome?
![]()
SAQ
3: How would the algorithms in this
example be modified to represent OOSD? (b) Would the different versions
of this algorithm have different OOSD versions?