|
|
An aspect of the Center for
Children
and Families
|
Topic:
Animal-assisted Therapy
Researched and
written by: Lindsay Wilson
I attest that the following
report is a product of my own original work.
Summary
Full
Report
Related Websites
References
Summary
|
Animal-assisted
therapy (AAT) is
the use of animals to attain certain goals in a professional
therapeutic
environment. The animals can be used to
promote certain advancements in individuals receiving therapy. Animal-assisted therapy can often be an
important
catalyst for therapist/patient bonding. A
survey of research shows that AAT can be extremely
helpful when used in an appropriate context
and setting. However, there is a
definite need for more research on this topic.
|
Animal-assisted
therapy (AAT) is a
fairly old practice, but it has just recently drawn a lot of attention
and
interest. The Delta Society (as cited by
Nebbe, n.d.) defines animal-assisted therapy as the use of an animal in
a goal
oriented intervention. AAT is provided and documented by professionals. Furthermore, it is designed to promote
advancements in social, emotional, physical, and/or cognitive operation
(Nebbe,
n.d.). It is also important to note that animal-assisted therapy should
always
be an adjunctive intervention and not in isolation of other services
(Fitchett,
Granger, Helmer, Kogan, & Young, 1999). Almost
any animal can be used in AAT as long as it
is a pleasant,
sociable animal. However, before
animal-assisted therapy can be implemented, the client’s feelings and
allergies
to animals should be taken into account.
Boris
Levinson was the first to
draw attention to the role of animals in therapy when he documented
that many
of his child clients that were withdrawn and uncommunicative would
respond
positively and interact when his dog, Jingles, was present (Netting,
New, &
Wilson, 1987). Since that time, AAT has been implemented worldwide and
has been
shown to be effective in many therapy programs. Animal-assisted therapy
has
been very effective with children and has been implemented into school
and
residential programs. However, most of the reported successes come in
the form
of case studies and personal anecdotes (Fawcett & Gullone, 2001)
and are
lacking empirical evidence.
AAT
is useful in all therapy
programs because animals can serve as a catalyst to conversation
(Netting, et
al., 1987). For this reason, Corson et
al. (as cited in Netting, et al., 1987) refer to the animal as a social
lubricant. An animal is useful as an
icebreaker (Missel,2001) to begin interactions with the therapist and
the
client. Animal-assisted therapy has also
demonstrated its usefulness in stress reduction and alleviation of
depression (Castro, Friend, McMahon, & Nathanson, 1997). Research has shown AAT’s association with
lowered heart rates and blood pressure (Friedmann as cited by Farnum
&
Martin, 2002), reduced anxiety (Barker as cited by Farnum & Martin,
2002),
and greater self-esteem (Walsh as cited by Farnum & Martin, 2002). The animals can be used to calm the clients
and create opportunities for discussion.
Animal-assisted
therapy has been
especially effective with children. Wilson’s
research (as
cited by Fawcett & Gullone, 2001) shows that children have an
innate
fascination and curiosity towards animals. One could see why it would
be easier
for a child to empathize and relate to an animal whose actions are
simple and
obvious, than with a human who exhibits more complex behaviors (Nebbe,
1991).
Beck and Katcher (as cited in Hanselman, 2001) stated that children are
more
relaxed when in the company of an animal. There
is evidence that a situation can be deemed
less threatening to a
child if an animal is present (Friedmann, Katcher, Lynch, Messent,
&
Thomas, 1983). This change in the
child’s view of the environment (Friedmann et al, 1983) can make a
therapist
seem friendlier and easier to talk to. A bond can be formed with the
therapists
due to the mutual relationship with the animal (Nebbe, 1991).
Animal-assisted therapy can be used
in specific target populations of children. It has been
proven effective with children who have
emotional disorders, pervasive developmental disorders and Down’s
syndrome
(Bradshaw, Cormack & Limond, 1997; Farnum & Martin, 2002;
Fitchett,et al., 1999; Gullone, 2003; Hanselman, 2001; Haynie, et
al., n.d.). AAT has been proven
successful for children that have emotional disorders.
An emotional disorder is defined as a chronic
condition characterized by emotional responses that differ from norms
(Shank,
Smith, Turnbull, & Turnbull, 2004). Davis (as cited
in Nebbe,
1991) found that children with emotion disorders become more readily
involved
with animals rather than people or tasks. The AAT program can help a
child that
is emotionally disturbed gain non-aggressive voice tones, appropriate
eye
contact, and proper techniques for sharing and playing (Fitchett, et
al., 1999)
by practicing with an animal. It is
easier to practice with an animal because they will not argue or reject
them.
These techniques, learned with an animal, can then be generalized to
other
humans.
One specific type of emotional
disorder, Conduct Disorder, which is defined by the DSM-IV (as cited by
Gullone, 2003) as a constant and repetitive pattern of behaviors that
violate
the basic rights of others and other age-appropriate societal norms, is
particularly targeted by animal-assisted therapy. It
is thought that by teaching children with
risk of conduct disorder (CD) to have empathy and concern for others,
their
developmental trajectories may be modified (Gullone, 2003). An animal-assisted therapy can be
directed
at re-focusing the child’s aggressive and dominating actions towards
caring and
gentle actions in a relationship free of rejection and full of
unconditional
positive regard. The child can form a secure attachment with another
living
being which will contribute to their basic sense of trust (Gullone,
2003). These lessons can then be
transferred to
human relationships.
Those with
pervasive developmental
disorders can be positively influenced by animal-assisted therapy. The
American
Psychiatric Association (as cited in Farnum & Martin, 2002) states
that pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) are a
genre of disorders including autistic
disorder, Rett’s syndrome, Asperger’s, childhood
disintegrative disorder, and PDDs not specified. Common to all of these
disorders is a lack of social interaction and communication skills
(Farnum
& Martin, 2002). Traditional
therapies have not been particularly helpful with these disorders. For this reason, animal-assisted therapy has
been gaining momentum in this field. ATT
has been shown as beneficial to these children by using animals as
transitional
objects between bonds with the animal to bonds with people. A study by Farnum and Martin (2002) found
that when in the presence of a therapy dog, children with pervasive
developmental disorders were happier, looked around the room less,
talked less
frequently about topics unrelated to a conversation, and were more
likely to
agree with requests made by the therapist. This
shows an increase in less one-sided, more
meaningful and focused
discussions.
A specific
type of pervasive
developmental disorder, autism, has been the sole topic of a few
studies in
animal-assisted therapy. Autism is a
neurological disorder that interferes with behavioral development
(Haynie, Gardner,
Reed, Sams, Sides,
Smith, et al., n.d.). It can include
deficient use of language, inability to focus, failure to interact, and
repetitive actions or behaviors. A study
by Haynie et al. (n.d.) of a school-based therapy program showed that
AAT
induced speech, self initiated interactions, and focus of previously
withdrawn
children. This shows that AAT can help
make improvements in the three areas that those with autism struggle
with the
most. In another study by Redefer &
Goodman (as cited by Farnum & Martin, 2002) animal assisted therapy
was
found to increase social behaviors, decrease stereotypical behaviors
(i.e.
hand-flapping), and decrease self-absorption. Animal-assisted
therapy should be considered a
highly exceptional option
for those with autism, considering that other therapies have not proven
very
helpful.
There is
also some interest in the
effect of animal-assisted therapy on children with Down’s syndrome. A
study by Bradshaw, Cormack and Limond
(1997) found that children with Down’s syndrome were more responsive to
the
therapist when a dog was present. Also,
the responses were more likely to be cooperative. Furthermore, the
children
were less distracted in sessions when the dog was present.
Overall, the study showed that the presence
of a dog, in therapy with children with Down’s syndrome, can encourage
positive
interactions and focus the child’s attention on the activities at hand.
Animal-animal
assisted therapy can
be used in schools and in residential facilities. Animals
can have visiting days with guidance
counselors in schools. This will give
the counselors a chance to talk to students who just want to stop in to
see the
animal (Chandler,
2001). Another possibility, pointed out
by Chandler
(2001), is that students who need to talk to the counselor can use the
animal
as an excuse to visit the office. As
Nebbe (1991) states, the animal can also establish a respect for the
counselor
and a rapport with the children. The animal makes the office feel like
a safe,
inviting environment.
In
residential facilities the
animals can be used as a peaceful escape as well as a learning tool. Green Chimney’s residential treatment center
is a farm for children that are experiencing emotional and academic
difficulties
(Mallon, 1994). Resident children are
allowed to visit, work at, and take classes on the farm.
In a study, by Mallon (1994), he found that
children visited the farm whenever they needed to feel better. Residents also reported talking to the
animals when they needed to confide in someone. They
trusted the animals because they knew the
animals would not judge
them or repeat what they said (Mallon, 2004). Just
talking about your problems, even if you are
talking to an animal,
can be therapeutic. Mallon (2004) also
describes how talking to the animal can serve as a catalytic agent in
bringing
the child together with a therapist. They
learn to trust the animals which can help them
transfer trust to
humans. Overall, the farm is a safe
place for these children to turn when they need to brighten their day.
Animal-assisted therapy has many
benefits for mankind. The right kind of
human-animal bond can create miracles. It
can help children learn to trust, love, and
nurture. Animals can teach responsibility
and
empathy. They can help a child learn
something it seemed impossible to teach them through human interaction.
However, there is not enough empirical evidence in this topic. Solid, experimental studies need to be done
to give this therapy the attention and backing it deserves. As more
research is
done, the benefits will become more apparent and current techniques
more
refined (Missel, 2001). With substantial evidence, will come financial
support
and a wider utilization of animal-assisted therapy.
|
|

References
Bradshaw,
J., Cormack, M., & Limond, J. (1997). Behavior of children with
learning
disabilities interacting with a therapy dog. Anthrozoos,
10(2-3), 84-89.
Castro,
D., Friend, H., McMahon, M., & Nathanson, D. (1997). Effectiveness
of
short-term dolphin-assisted therapy for children with severe
disabilities. Anthrozoos, 10(2-3),
90-100.
Chandler, C.
(2001).
Animal-assisted therapy in counseling and school setting.
Retrieved on November 1, 2004, from http://www.ericfacility.net/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed459404.html.
Farnum,
J. & Martin, F. (2002). Animal-assisted therapy for children with
pervasive
developmental disorders. Western
Journal of Nursing Research, 24(6), 657-670.
Fitchett,
J., Granger, B., Helmer, K., Kogan, L., & Young, K. (1999). The
human-animal team approach for children with emotional disorders: Two
case
studies. Child & Youth Care
Forum, 28(2), 105-121.
Fawcett,
N. & Cullone, E. (2001). Cute and cuddly and a whole lot more? A
call for
empirical investigation into therapeutic benefits of human-animal
interaction
for children. Behaviour Change, 18(2),
124-133
Friedmann,
E., Katcher, A., Lynch, J., Messent, P., & Thomas, S. (1983).
Social
interaction and blood pressure: Influence of animal companions. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,
171(8), 461-465.
Gullone,
E. (2003). The proposed
benefits of incorporating non-human animals into preventative<>
efforts
for
Conduct Disorder. Anthrozoos, 16(2), 160-174
Hanselman, J.
(2001). Coping skills
intervention with adolescents in anger management using animals in
therapy. Journal of
Adolescent Group Therapy, 11(4),
159-195.
Haynie,
K., Gardner,
A., Reed, C., Sams, M., Sides, J., Smith, H., et al. (n.d.).
Differential
behavioral responses in autistic children: Animal-assisted therapy
versus
conventional therapy. Retrieved November
8, 2004, from http://www.pan-inc.org/html/fall9903.html.
Mallon,
G. (1994). Cow as co-therapist: Utilization of farm animals as
therapeutic
aides with children in residential treatment. Child
& Adolescent Social Work Journal, 11(6),
455-474.
Missel, M. (2001). The use of
choice theory in animal assisted therapy for children and young
adults. International Journal of
Reality Therapy,
20(2), 40-41.
Nebbe,
L. (n.d.). Animal-assisted activities/therapy as an animal and
human welfare
project. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from Psychologists For The
Ethical
Treatment Of Animals Web site: http://www.psyeta.org/hia/vol8/nebbe.html.
Nebbe,
L. (1991). The human-animal bond and the elementary school counselor. School Counselor, 38(5), 362-371.
Netting,
E., New, J., & Wilson, C. (1987). The human-animal bond:
Implications for
practice. Social Work, 32(1),
60-64.
Shank,
M., Smith, S., Turnbull, A., & Turnbull, T. (2004). Exceptional
Lives:
Special education in today’s schools (4th ed.). New Jersey:
Pearson
Prentice Hall.
This website is a
service learning project by the students of "Psychology of the
Exceptional Child" at Frostburg State University. Manager of web
page and project:
Dr. Megan E. Bradley |