| Childhood/ Family Life
Fechner
was born in southeastern
Germany in a small village on April 1, 1801. He came from a
religious
background, being the son and grandson of pastors. His father was
the village pastor and demanded a very strict and focused childhood for
Fechner. However, his father died early in his childhood,
creating
a dramatic upheaval in Fechner’s life (Rosenzweig, 1987). He
moved
with his mother and brother to live with his uncle, where he remained
until
1817. At the young age of 16, he went to the University of
Leipzig
to begin medical studies, where he remained for the rest of his
life.
By 1822, and at 21 years of age, Fechner received his MD degree
(Schultz
& Schultz, 2000).
Adult Life
Although receiving his degree
in medicine, Fechner’s interests moved to physics and math. In
1831,
he wrote a paper on electricity, which got him invited to become a
professor
of physics at Leipzig (Rosenzweig, 1987). He also translated many
physics and chemistry books from French into German, which brought him
recognition as a physicist. He lectured in physics at the
university
and even conducted his own research (Schultz & Schultz,
2000).
He became friends with a number of people, including Wilhelm Wundt, the
founder of psychology. This broadened his interests from physics
to psychology (Rosenzweig, 1987).
Fechner carried a very
humanistic
viewpoint, which was in opposition to the currently accepted
mechanistic
view (Rosenzweig, 1987). The mechanistic view held that humans
were
machines. It assumed that humans were passive and had no free
will,
but were affected by the environment (Schultz & Schultz,
2000).
Fechner believed more that humans had free will and were not just
passive
machines that needed to be acted upon (Rosenzweig, 1987).
Fechner was very interested
in vision. He was interested in sensation and wanted to conduct
research
on afterimages. He injured his eyes while conducting an
experiment
in which he stared at the sun through colored glasses. His eyes
became
unusually sensitive to light. He could not stand even the
smallest
bit of light and spent most of his days in a dark, closed-off room
where
the walls were painted black. He became very depressed and
continued
to be so for the next many years. He was exhausted, could not
sleep,
and could not eat. He tried many things to cure his illness,
including
laxatives and even electric shock. None of these therapies
provided
a cure. One day, a friend of Fechner’s claimed that she had a
dream
and that the dream told her how she could cure his long lasting
depression.
She said that if she prepared a certain dinner of raw spiced ham in
Rhine
wine and lemon juice, he would be cured. After eating the meal,
Fechner
claimed that he felt better. This suggests that Fechner’s illness
may have been slightly neurotic. However, his improvement did not
continue and after only six months, his symptoms returned and even
worsened.
He then had a dream that included the number 77. He believed that
he would be well in 77 days. This again suggests neurotic roots
to
his illness because he did get well in 77 days. His depression
turned
to heightened euphoria and delusions of grandeur (Schultz &
Schultz,
2000). Through this experience, Fechner developed the pleasure
principle,
which is the tendency to seek pleasure and avoid pain (Reber,
1995).
His interests soon turned
to philosophy after the nervous breakdown. The depression caused
him to be dismissed from his prestigious position at Leipzig due to the
fact that he was officially recognized as invalid (Schultz &
Schultz,
2000). He found comfort and interest in philosophy at this
time.
He related to panpsychism, in which he found a personal religion
(Rosenzweig,
1987). Panpsychism is the belief that everything in the world has
some mental aspect. This view ascribes some degree of
consiousness,
however small, even to apparently inanimate bits of matter (Kemerling,
2001). As a panpsychist, he believed that all objects on earth
were
capable of conciousness and life to some degree. He even believed
that the earth itself had a soul and could be seen from the standpoint
of conciousness. He called this the “day view”. His views
were
once again in opposition to the more accepted views of the time.
The “night view” of materialism stated that the universe consisted of
nothing
but inert matter. Even consciousness was inert matter
(Rosenzweig,
1987). Under the pseudonym “Dr. Mises”, he wrote essays using
ridicule
and sarcasm to satirize medicine and science (Schultz & Schultz,
2000).
He communicated his spiritual perspective in an amusing way in these
essays.
Aspects of panpsychism can be found in these essays (Rosenzweig,
1987).
So why would a man of science, a man who has studied psychology,
medicine,
and physics, ridicule medicine and science? Fechner had two sides
to his personality which created an intrapersonal conflict that he
dealt
with throughout his life. He held an interest in science,
but
also, an interest in the metaphysical (Schultz & Schultz,
2000).
Professional Accomplishments
Fechner
was very interested
in sensation. On October 22, 1850, Fechner was lying in bed and
realized
that a connection between the mind and the body could be made through a
relationship between mental sensation and material stimulus. By
relating
the body and mind to each other empirically, Fechner made it possible
to
conduct experiments on the mind. This was a huge turning point in
psychology at the time. Fechner now had to decide how he would
measure
both stimulus and sensation. Stimulus could be easily measured by
physical intensity. Fechner proposed two ways to measure
sensations.
The first way was to determine if the stimulus is present at all and
can
be sensed, or if the stimulus is absent and can not be sensed.
The
second way was through the absolute threshold. The absolute
threshold
determined the point of sensitivity at which below, sensations can not
be experienced. However, above this point, sensations can be
experienced
(Schultz & Schultz, 2000).
While this method was
useful,
it could only identify the lowest point of sensation. Fechner
needed
to measure more levels of sensitivity and developed the differential
threshold.
The differential threshold measures the point of sensitivity at which
the
smallest amount of change in a stimulus can be detected in a
sensation.
This concept related back to Weber’s concept of just noticeable
difference,
which is the smallest difference that can be detected between two
stimuli.
Due to the differential threshold, stimulus and sensation could be
measured.
Fechner proposed a mathematical equation to measure the two: S = K log
R. In this equation, S is the sensation, K is a constant, and R
is
the stimulus. Fechner later realized that the equation he derived
for the measurement of stimulus and sensation had essentially come from
what Weber’s work had already shown. The significance of this
equation
was that it showed that psychological events could be tied to
measurable
physical events in a systematic way. This had been thought to be
impossible. Fechner helped to make it known that psychology was
in
fact, a science (Schultz & Schultz, 2000).
Fechner then moved on to
do research in psychophysics. Psychophysics is the relationship
between
the mental and material world (Schultz & Schultz, 2000). This
area combined both parts of Fechner’s personality, letting his interest
in science and his interest in the metaphysical work together.
Fechner’s
research included three fundamental methods used in psychophysics
today.
The method of average error consists of adjusting a variable stimulus
until
it is perceived to be equal with the constant stimulus. The mean,
or average, value of the differences represents the error. This
method
is used often in psychology through calculating the mean (Schultz &
Schultz, 2000).
Fechner also worked on the
method of constant stimuli and the method of limits. His research
in psychophysics lasted seven years. One of his major lasting
contributions
to scientific psychology was his textbook, “Elements of Psychophysics”
(1860). Through his precise techniques of measurement, Fechner
helped
declare psychology a science. He is often called the Father of
Experimental
Psychology. However, Fechner did not set out to “found” a new
school
of thought. He was interested in research, nothing more.
Therefore,
he is not accredited with the founding of psychology. The
deliberate
and intentional act of founding arrived 15 years after Fechner’s
textbook
was published and the honors were given to Wilhelm Wundt (Schultz &
Schultz, 2000).
Much later, Fechner’s work
also had an impact on another famous psychologist by the name of
Freud.
Fechner was interested in the unconscious. He suggested that the
unconscious was like an iceberg in that the greater part of the mind
lay
below the surface and is interacted upon by unseen forces. This
suggestion
influenced Freud and the development of psychoanalysis. Freud was
also influenced by Fechner’s pleasure principle, and even enjoyed
reading
many of Fechner’s satirical essays under the pen name Mr. Mises
(Schultz
& Schultz, 2000). Fechner’s impact on psychology did not end
with his work, but continued to impact other significant psychologists
in the years to come.
|